Thompson v. Howell
Opinion
1 2 3 4
5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 LaQuan Thompson, Case No.: 2:21-cv-00511-GMN-NJK
9 Petitioner, Order 10 v.
11 Jerry Howell, et al.,
12 Respondents.
14 This is a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 brought by LaQuan 15 Thompson, a Nevada prisoner. On March 31, 2022, this court entered an order requiring 16 Thompson to show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 17 the total exhaustion rule established by Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522 (1982). ECF No. 18. 18 In response to that order, Thompson has filed a declaration that he wishes to formally and 19 forever abandon the unexhausted grounds for relief in his federal habeas petition and proceed on 20 his exhausted ground for relief – i.e., his ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) claim in Ground 21 1. ECF No. 19. 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all grounds for relief in Thompson’s habeas petition 23 (ECF No. 5) are dismissed except for his IAC claim in Ground 1. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 30 days from the date this order 2 is entered to file an answer to Thompson's remaining ground for relief. Thompson shall 3 thereafter have 30 days in which to file a reply. 4 Dated: April 28, 2022 5 _________________________________ U.S. District Judge Gloria M. Navarro 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Howell (Thompson v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.