Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks

166 S.E. 927, 203 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 114

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 2, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.E. 927 (Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks, 166 S.E. 927, 203 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 114 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was sufficient evidence at tbe trial of tbis action to support tbe findings of fact made by tbe referee, and approved by tbe judge. These findings of fact are, therefore, conclusive.

“It is settled by all tbe decisions on tbe subject, with none to tbe contrary, that tbe findings of fact, made by a referee, and approved by tbe trial judge, are not subject to review on appeal, if they are supported by any competent evidence.” Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N. C., 44, 138 S. E., 349.

Tbe judgment upon tbe facts set out in tbe report of tbe referee, is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI