Thompson v. Hoge
This text of 30 Cal. 179 (Thompson v. Hoge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
One of the points upon which the defendants rely, is that the resolution of intention to grade the street, which was passed by the Board of Supervisors in March, 1862, was pot presented to the President of the Board of Supervisors for his approval, and is therefore void. The point was considered in Creighton v. Manson, 27 Cal. 613, 628, and it was there held that the Consolidation Act required the resolution to be presented to the President of the Board of Supervisors, because it was in substance a legislative act and must be passed in the [180]*180mode prescribed by law for the passage of an ordinance. Upon the authority of that case the judgment must be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Cal. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-hoge-cal-1866.