Thompson v. Hoge

30 Cal. 179
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1866
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Cal. 179 (Thompson v. Hoge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Hoge, 30 Cal. 179 (Cal. 1866).

Opinions

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

One of the points upon which the defendants rely, is that the resolution of intention to grade the street, which was passed by the Board of Supervisors in March, 1862, was pot presented to the President of the Board of Supervisors for his approval, and is therefore void. The point was considered in Creighton v. Manson, 27 Cal. 613, 628, and it was there held that the Consolidation Act required the resolution to be presented to the President of the Board of Supervisors, because it was in substance a legislative act and must be passed in the [180]*180mode prescribed by law for the passage of an ordinance. Upon the authority of that case the judgment must be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Creighton v. Manson
27 Cal. 613 (California Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Cal. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-hoge-cal-1866.