Thompson v. Hintgen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Thompson v. Hintgen

11 Wis. 112

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[114]*114 By the Court,

Paine, J.

The order appealed from in this case must be reversed. The only question involved is, as to the sufficiency of the statement, upon which the judgment by confession was entered. In the case of Nichols vs. Kribs, 10 Wis., 76, we had occasion to decide upon the character of ■such statements, and the one in question is clearly insufficient, within the rule there established.

The order of the court below, overruling the motion to set aside the judgment, is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[114]*114 By the Court,

Paine, J.

The order appealed from in this case must be reversed. The only question involved is, as to the sufficiency of the statement, upon which the judgment by confession was entered. In the case of Nichols vs. Kribs, 10 Wis., 76, we had occasion to decide upon the character of ■such statements, and the one in question is clearly insufficient, within the rule there established.

The order of the court below, overruling the motion to set aside the judgment, is reversed, with costs.

Thompson v. Hintgen, 11 Wis. 112 (Wis. 1860).

Pincite

11 Wis. 112 (Thompson v. Hintgen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related