Thompson v. Hintgen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Thompson v. Hintgen

11 Wis. 112

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMay 4, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 11 Wis. 112 (Thompson v. Hintgen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Hintgen, 11 Wis. 112 (Wis. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

[114]*114 By the Court,

Paine, J.

The order appealed from in this case must be reversed. The only question involved is, as to the sufficiency of the statement, upon which the judgment by confession was entered. In the case of Nichols vs. Kribs, 10 Wis., 76, we had occasion to decide upon the character of ■such statements, and the one in question is clearly insufficient, within the rule there established.

The order of the court below, overruling the motion to set aside the judgment, is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[114]*114 By the Court,

Paine, J.

The order appealed from in this case must be reversed. The only question involved is, as to the sufficiency of the statement, upon which the judgment by confession was entered. In the case of Nichols vs. Kribs, 10 Wis., 76, we had occasion to decide upon the character of ■such statements, and the one in question is clearly insufficient, within the rule there established.

The order of the court below, overruling the motion to set aside the judgment, is reversed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Wis. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-hintgen-wis-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack