Thompson v. Hillery
158 A.D.2d 525, 551 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1823
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 1990
StatusPublished
This text of 158 A.D.2d 525 (Thompson v. Hillery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thompson v. Hillery, 158 A.D.2d 525, 551 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
The extraordinary remedy of a writ of prohibition does not properly lie under the instant circumstances in view of the availability of an adequate remedy at law (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731; Matter of Motea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Molea v. Marasco
475 N.E.2d 109 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Lipari v. Owens
514 N.E.2d 378 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 525, 551 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-hillery-nyappdiv-1990.