Thompson v. . Herring
164 S.E. 619, 203 N.C. 112, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 319
Opinion
after stating the case: The plea in abatement was properly overruled. Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375, 160 S. E., 357. The parties are not the same and the causes of action are different in the two suits. A final judgment in the action brought in Greene County by L. E. -Herring against B. G. Thompson would not support a plea of res judicata in the present action instituted in Wayne County. This is one of the tests of identity. Bank v. Broadhurst, 197 N. C., 365, 148 S. E., 452.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. . Herring, 164 S.E. 619, 203 N.C. 112, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 319 (N.C. 1932).
164 S.E. 619 (Thompson v. . Herring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Dennis v. Thomas
70 S.E.2d 3 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)