Thompson v. Haselton
This text of 24 N.W. 199 (Thompson v. Haselton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from was made upon an order fo show cause wliy the relief therein specified should not be granted., Upon proof of due service of the order to show cause, there being no’ appearance in response thereto, the order sought was granted of course, pursuant to rule 10 of the district court, without a consideration of the merits of the application. An order so granted will not be reviewed, and the merits considered, upon an appeal therefrom to this court. The party aggrieved should seek in the district court relief from his default, and a hearing upon the merits. Dols v. Baumhoefer, 28 Minn. 387.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 N.W. 199, 34 Minn. 12, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-haselton-minn-1885.