Thompson v. Hamm
108 A. 925, 118 Me. 501, 1919 Me. LEXIS 108
This text of 108 A. 925 (Thompson v. Hamm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thompson v. Hamm, 108 A. 925, 118 Me. 501, 1919 Me. LEXIS 108 (Me. 1919).
Opinion
This case is decided upon the docket entries, to wit: Ent. at Bangor, 1919; 3d. writing; both briefs to be filed before Portland term; if not, judgment for plaintiff; case and plaintiff’s brief in.
The defendant’s brief was not filed in accordance with the docket entry nor is it yet filed. Judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 A. 925, 118 Me. 501, 1919 Me. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-hamm-me-1919.