Thompson v. Grofried Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thompson v. Grofried Realty Corp.

20 A.D.2d 664, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 664 (Thompson v. Grofried Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Grofried Realty Corp., 20 A.D.2d 664, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 27, 1961 after trial upon- a jury’s verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $15,000. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hill and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial unless plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce to $10,000 the verdict in her favor; and if plaintiff so stipulates, vote to affirm the judgment as thus reduced, with the following memorandum: In our opinion under all the circumstances disclosed by this record, the verdict of $15,000 was excessive at least to the extent indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 27, 1961 after trial upon- a jury’s verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $15,000. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hill and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial unless plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce to $10,000 the verdict in her favor; and if plaintiff so stipulates, vote to affirm the judgment as thus reduced, with the following memorandum: In our opinion under all the circumstances disclosed by this record, the verdict of $15,000 was excessive at least to the extent indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 664, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-grofried-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack