Thompson v. Greenville Traction Co.
This text of 107 S.E. 911 (Thompson v. Greenville Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The plaintiff, Mrs. Thompson, a passenger upon the defendant’s street car, slipped upon a banana peel and fell, sustaining personal injury, as she was alighting from the car at the Southern Railway Station in the city of Green-ville, the terminus of the line. The Circuit Judge ordered a non-suit upon the ground that there was no evidence tending to show negligence on the part of the defendant. His ruling is sustained upon the grounds stated by him. A *446 public street in a city is not to be regarded as a passenger station, for the safety of which a street railway' company npay be responsible, when used by passengers as a place to alight.
The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.E. 911, 116 S.C. 444, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-greenville-traction-co-sc-1921.