Thompson v. Governor

Indiana Supreme Court

Thompson v. Governor

2 Blackf. 142, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 12

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1828·Published

Opinion

IF a suit be brought on a collector’s bond against the principal and sureties, it is error to take judgment against the sure-[143]*143tics alone, without a suggestion on the record of the sheriff’s return to the writ of “non est inventus” as to the principal. R. C. 1824, p. 290.—Morris v. Knight, 1 Blackf. 106.—Colman v. Graeter, id. 388. See 1 Saund. p. 207, n. 2, p. 291, n. 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IF a suit be brought on a collector’s bond against the principal and sureties, it is error to take judgment against the sure-[143]*143tics alone, without a suggestion on the record of the sheriff’s return to the writ of “non est inventus” as to the principal. R. C. 1824, p. 290.—Morris v. Knight, 1 Blackf. 106.—Colman v. Graeter, id. 388. See 1 Saund. p. 207, n. 2, p. 291, n. 4

Thompson v. Governor, 2 Blackf. 142, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 12 (Ind. 1828).

Pincite

2 Blackf. 142 (Thompson v. Governor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related