Thompson v. Glover

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thompson v. Glover

19 A.D.2d 753, 242 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 753 (Thompson v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Glover, 19 A.D.2d 753, 242 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injury to person and property, the plaintiff appeals (as limited by her brief) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 8, 1962 after trial upon a jury’s verdict, as limited to six cents her damages for her personal injury. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Under the court’s c-harge (which was binding because not excepted to), the nominal award of six cents constituted a finding by the jury that the accident resulted solely from defendants’ negligence, but that the plaintiff sustained no injury attributable thereto. Such finding has adequate support in the record. Ughetta, Acting- P. J., ICleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injury to person and property, the plaintiff appeals (as limited by her brief) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 8, 1962 after trial upon a jury’s verdict, as limited to six cents her damages for her personal injury. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Under the court’s c-harge (which was binding because not excepted to), the nominal award of six cents constituted a finding by the jury that the accident resulted solely from defendants’ negligence, but that the plaintiff sustained no injury attributable thereto. Such finding has adequate support in the record. Ughetta, Acting- P. J., ICleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 753, 242 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-glover-nyappdiv-1963.