Thompson v. Gibbs

Texas Supreme Court

Thompson v. Gibbs

240 S.W.2d 287, 150 Tex. 315, 1951 Tex. LEXIS 391

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedMay 23, 1951

DocketA-3155

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 240 S.W.2d 287 (Thompson v. Gibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Gibbs, 240 S.W.2d 287, 150 Tex. 315, 1951 Tex. LEXIS 391 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Court of Civil Appeals modified the judgment of the trial court by reducing the amount of attorney’s fees from $450.00 to $20.00. 238 S. W. 2d 213. That is a material reduction in the amount of recovery in the trial court. It, nevertheless, taxed the costs of appeal against appellant, without entering of record of any cause therefore. Such ruling is in conflict with Campbell Cleaning & Dye Works v. Porter, 183 S. W. 2d 253. Under Rule of Civil Procedure No. 483 this court may, in its discretion, without the necessity of granting a writ of error and hearing the case, reverse and remand the case on application for writ of error where the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with a previous opinion of the Supreme Court. While the opinion in Campbell, etc. v. Porter, supra, was by the Court of Civil Appeals, this court made that opinion its own, in effect, by refusing, without qualification, an application for writ of error therein. It therefore appears that the opinion of the Court *317 of Civil Appeals in the particular above named is in conflict with a prior opinoin of this court. No other assignment in the application for writ of error is sustained. Accordingly it is ordered that the case be remanded to the Court of Civil Appeals to tax the costs of appeal in conformity with Rule 139; provided, however, that if cause exists for not doing so. such cause be stated on the record as provided in Rule 141. Opinion delivered May 23, 1951.

Rehearing overruled June 20, 1951.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The Court of Civil Appeals modified the judgment of the trial court by reducing the amount of attorney’s fees from $450.00 to $20.00. 238 S. W. 2d 213. That is a material reduction in the amount of recovery in the trial court. It, nevertheless, taxed the costs of appeal against appellant, without entering of record of any cause therefore. Such ruling is in conflict with Campbell Cleaning & Dye Works v. Porter, 183 S. W. 2d 253. Under Rule of Civil Procedure No. 483 this court may, in its discretion, without the necessity of granting a writ of error and hearing the case, reverse and remand the case on application for writ of error where the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with a previous opinion of the Supreme Court. While the opinion in Campbell, etc. v. Porter, supra, was by the Court of Civil Appeals, this court made that opinion its own, in effect, by refusing, without qualification, an application for writ of error therein. It therefore appears that the opinion of the Court *317 of Civil Appeals in the particular above named is in conflict with a prior opinoin of this court. No other assignment in the application for writ of error is sustained. Accordingly it is ordered that the case be remanded to the Court of Civil Appeals to tax the costs of appeal in conformity with Rule 139; provided, however, that if cause exists for not doing so. such cause be stated on the record as provided in Rule 141. Opinion delivered May 23, 1951.

Rehearing overruled June 20, 1951.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 S.W.2d 287, 150 Tex. 315, 1951 Tex. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-gibbs-tex-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack