Thompson v. Filers.

126 So. 766, 99 Fla. 539
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 12, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*540 Per Curiam.

Upon this cause having been set down for oral argument the appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Under the provisions of Rule 23 for the government of the Supreme Court, the appellant has the right to pursue this course and there having been no cross assignments of error filed by the appellees, and the cause not having been reached for final disposition by the Court at' the time when this motion was filed the Court is bound by the provisions of the rule. The motion should, therefore, be granted and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment'. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Filers., 126 So. 766, 99 Fla. 539 (Fla. 1930).

126 So. 766 (Thompson v. Filers.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. Pearson
236 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Bird Road Baptist Church, Inc. v. Stevens
155 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Gill v. Smith
161 So. 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)