Thompson v. Filers.

126 So. 766, 99 Fla. 539
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 126 So. 766 (Thompson v. Filers.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Filers., 126 So. 766, 99 Fla. 539 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

*540 Per Curiam.

Upon this cause having been set down for oral argument the appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Under the provisions of Rule 23 for the government of the Supreme Court, the appellant has the right to pursue this course and there having been no cross assignments of error filed by the appellees, and the cause not having been reached for final disposition by the Court at' the time when this motion was filed the Court is bound by the provisions of the rule. The motion should, therefore, be granted and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment'. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. Pearson
236 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Bird Road Baptist Church, Inc. v. Stevens
155 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Gill v. Smith
161 So. 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 766, 99 Fla. 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-filers-fla-1930.