Thompson v. Dunnington

176 F. 1023, 100 C.C.A. 669, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4326
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 1910·No. No. 941·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of this record, we are clearly of the opinion that the alleged errors sought to be revised and corrected present not alone questions of law but of fact, and should, therefore, have been brought here by appeal; but, while we reach this conclusion, we nevertheless realize the case has been properly determined on its merits. Coder, Trustee, v. Aris, 213 U. S. 223, 29 Sup. Ct. 436, 53 L. Ed. 772; Steiner v. Marshall, 140 Fed. 710, 72 C. C. A. 103; Kenova L. & T. Co. v. Graham, 135 Fed. 717, 68 C. C. A. 355. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Dunnington, 176 F. 1023, 100 C.C.A. 669, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4326 (4th Cir. 1910).

176 F. 1023 (Thompson v. Dunnington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coder v. Arts
213 U.S. 223 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Kenova Loan & Trust Co. v. Graham
135 F. 717 (Fourth Circuit, 1905)
Steiner v. Marshall
140 F. 710 (Fourth Circuit, 1905)