Thompson v. Director, Dept. of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Thompson v. Director, Dept. of Corrections

25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20858, 1994 WL 259263

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 1994

Docket94-6021

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1041 (Thompson v. Director, Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Director, Dept. of Corrections, 25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20858, 1994 WL 259263 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Andre THOMPSON; Harrison Lee Jones; Gary William
Bennicoff; Briscoe Arthur Harris, II; Mark J.
Patterson; Clifton Smith; Shawn M.
Reed, Plaintiffs Appellants,
v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6021.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 1994.
Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-93-1509-AM).

Michael Andre Thompson, Harrison Lee Jones, Gary William Bennicoff, Briscoe Arthur Harris, II, Mark J. Patterson, Clifton Smith, Shawn M. Reed, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.Va. AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-93-1509-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Andre THOMPSON; Harrison Lee Jones; Gary William
Bennicoff; Briscoe Arthur Harris, II; Mark J.
Patterson; Clifton Smith; Shawn M.
Reed, Plaintiffs Appellants,
v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6021.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 1994.
Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-93-1509-AM).

Michael Andre Thompson, Harrison Lee Jones, Gary William Bennicoff, Briscoe Arthur Harris, II, Mark J. Patterson, Clifton Smith, Shawn M. Reed, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.Va. AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-93-1509-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20858, 1994 WL 259263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-director-dept-of-corrections-ca4-1994.