Thompson v. Devoe
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of a Rule 60(b)(4), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, motion. This is the second appeal of the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion in this case. See Thompson v. Devoe, 611 So.2d 1081 (Ala. Civ.App.1992).
In this motion, Larry Thompson contends that he is entitled to relief from judgment [464]*464because of ineffective service. After a review of the record, we cannot hold that the trial court committed an abuse of discretion in failing to grant the Rule 60(b)(4) motion. Wilson v. Cox, 589 So.2d 723 (Ala.1991). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
627 So. 2d 463 (Thompson v. Devoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.