Thompson v. Devoe
This text of 627 So. 2d 463 (Thompson v. Devoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of a Rule 60(b)(4), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, motion. This is the second appeal of the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion in this case. See Thompson v. Devoe, 611 So.2d 1081 (Ala. Civ.App.1992).
In this motion, Larry Thompson contends that he is entitled to relief from judgment [464]*464because of ineffective service. After a review of the record, we cannot hold that the trial court committed an abuse of discretion in failing to grant the Rule 60(b)(4) motion. Wilson v. Cox, 589 So.2d 723 (Ala.1991). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 So. 2d 463, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 244, 1993 WL 168220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-devoe-alacivapp-1993.