Thompson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Common Pleas Clerk of Courts

2023 Ohio 4547

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: December 12, 2023
• Docket: 112982
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as Thompson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Common Pleas Clerk of Courts, 2023-Ohio-4547.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

MICHAEL THOMPSON, :

Relator, : No. 112982 v. :

CLERK OF COURTS, COMMON : PLEAS, CUYAHOGA COUNTY,

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED DATED: December 12, 2023

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 566706 Order No. 569801

Appearances:

Michael Thompson, pro se.

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Owen Knapp, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

LISA B. FORBES, J.:

Michael Thompson, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of

mandamus. Thompson seeks an order from this court that requires the Cuyahoga

County Clerk of Courts (“Clerk”), the respondent, “[t]o process motion. [T]o stamp filed motion. Sent [copies] to all [parties]. Let process move forward so Judge

Nancy Fuerst can make decision.” Sua sponte, we dismiss Thompson’s complaint

for a writ of mandamus.

We find that Thompson’s complaint for mandamus is procedurally

defective for failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) and (C). The Supreme Court of

Ohio, with regard to the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, has held that

[t]he requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory and failure to comply with them requires dismissal of an inmate’s complaint. State ex rel. Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 87 Ohio St.3d 258, 259, 1999 Ohio 53, 719 N.E.2d 544 (1999), citing State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 422, 1998 Ohio 218, 696 N.E.2d 594 (1998). As held by the court of appeals, the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) must be filed at the time the complaint is filed, and an inmate may not cure the defect by later filings. Fuqua v. Williams, 100 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-Ohio-5533, ¶ 9, 797 N.E.2d 982 (an inmate’s “belated attempt to file the required affidavit does not excuse his noncompliance. See R.C. 2969.25(A), which requires that the affidavit be filed ‘[a]t the time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal against a government entity or employee’”).

(Emphasis sic.) State ex rel. Hall v. Mohr, 140 Ohio St.3d 297, 2014-Ohio-3735, 17

N.E.3d 581, ¶ 4. See also State ex rel. Swopes v. McCormick, 171 Ohio St.3d 492,

2022-Ohio-4408, 218 N.E.3d 864; State ex rel. Watkins v. Andrews, 142 Ohio St.3d

308, 2015-Ohio-1100, 29 N.E.3d 976; Foster v. State, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga

No. 113109, 2023-Ohio-3254.

Thompson has failed to file an affidavit of prior civil actions as

required by R.C. 2969.25(A). In addition, Thompson has failed to provide a certified

copy of the institutional cashier’s statement, where he is incarcerated, setting forth

the balance in his inmate account as required by R.C. 2969.25(C). Accordingly, we sua sponte dismiss Thompson’s complaint for a writ

of mandamus. Costs to Thompson. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all

parties with notice of this judgment and the date of entry upon the journal as

required by Civ.R. 58(B).

Complaint dismissed.

________________________ LISA B. FORBES, JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, III, P.J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR