Thompson v. Croff
This text of 234 N.W. 688 (Thompson v. Croff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action is for the specific performance of an alleged contract for deed. Plaintiff attacks a finding of the trial court to the effect that the alleged contract was incomplete and therefore unenforceable. This and numerous other assignments of error are not here considered since they avail plaintiff nothing because of either of two other findings of the trial court which are sustained by the evidence. One of these findings is that the plaintiff procured the contract by fraud; the other is that plaintiff is insolvent and is'financially unable to perform the contract on his own part.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 N.W. 688, 182 Minn. 433, 1931 Minn. LEXIS 1190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-croff-minn-1931.