Thompson v. Credit One Bank, N.A.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 19, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00266·Unknown

Opinion

3 * * *

4 BRANDON THOMPSON, on behalf of Case No. 2:20-cv-00266-GMN-EJY himself and all others similarly situated, 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., 8 Defendant. 9 10 Before the Court is the Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 23) submitted 11 by the parties presenting their alternative views. The Court notes that Defendant has filed a Motion 12 to Stay the Case (ECF No. 7) “pending the United States Supreme Court’s determination in William 13 P. Barr et al. v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., No. 19-361, petition for 14 certiorari accepted January 10, 2020, which addresses the constitutionality of Section 227(b) of the 15 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) … .” The Motion to Stay the Case was fully briefed 16 as of April 6, 2020. Since that time, the matter pending before the U.S. Supreme Court was argued 17 on May 6, 2020. Although not assured, Supreme Court decisions are often issued in June. 18 In this case, while there is no assurance that the Supreme Court will issue its decision in Barr 19 v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. within the next four to six weeks, it is likely 20 that a decision on the matter before the U.S. Supreme Court will be issued in the near future. The 21 decision could be case dispositive. Given the potential impact the decision may have on the instant 22 dispute, a brief delay in commencing discovery is efficient. 23 The Court does not agree, however, that discovery should be delayed until after the Court 24 issues an order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. First, no motion to stay discovery was filed and, 25 for this reason alone, the issue is not properly before the Court. Second, the fact that a dispositive 26 motion is pending is not generally sufficient to support a stay of discovery. Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, 27 Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 601 (D. Nev. 2011). 1 The next issue is whether discovery should be conducted in phases. Defendant argues phased 2 discovery preserves resources of the Court and the parties and, for this reason, Defendant seeks to 3 limit phase one of discovery to issues pertaining solely to the named plaintiff. This is to be followed 4 by a motion for summary judgment. Defendant states that if summary judgment is not granted in its 5 favor in full, there would then be a second round of discovery followed by additional motion practice 6 and another motion for summary judgment. Based on Defendant’s sole argument of efficiency, the 7 Court does not agree that phased discovery is warranted. 8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that discovery is stayed until such time as the U.S. 9 Supreme Court issues its opinion in William P. Barr et al. v. American Association of Political 10 Consultants, Inc., No. 19-361. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status report on or before 12 June 30, 2020, advising the Court of the status of the case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court 13 and providing a very brief summary of the outcome, if any, is available. If no decision is reached 14 by June 30, 2020, the status report shall so state. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the decision in William P. Barr et al. v. American 16 Association of Political Consultants, Inc. does not moot the named plaintiff’s claims, the discovery 17 period shall commence one week after the decision is issued. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery shall not be conducted in phases; provided, 19 however, that the parties are free to seek the assistance of the Court, if desired or necessary, to 20 streamline discovery through the use of ordinary tools available in class actions such as, but not 21 limited to, sampling of data. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the discovery period shall be a period of 240 days, 23 allowing the parties ample time to conduct individual, class, and expert discovery. The parties shall 24 submit a discovery plan and scheduling order, including all terms applicable thereto, within ten days 25 of the commencement of the discovery period. 26 Dated this 19th day of May, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Credit One Bank, N.A., (D. Nev. 2020).

Thompson v. Credit One Bank, N.A. (Thompson v. Credit One Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.
278 F.R.D. 597 (D. Nevada, 2011)