Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc.

954 So. 2d 60, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2007 WL 879003

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2007

DocketNo. 1D06-1690

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 954 So. 2d 60 (Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc., 954 So. 2d 60, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2007 WL 879003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Robert Thompson, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims denying benefits for two work related accidents occurring on June 16, 2001, and August 7, 2001. The appellant correctly argues that no competent substantial evidence exists in the record to support the finding that there is a medical relationship between the appellant’s work place injury and his undisclosed prior injury. Therefore, the Judge of Compensation Claims erred in concluding that the appellant’s petitions for benefits were barred by the Martin v. Carpenter, 132 So.2d 400 (Fla.1961), defense. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Robert Thompson, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims denying benefits for two work related accidents occurring on June 16, 2001, and August 7, 2001. The appellant correctly argues that no competent substantial evidence exists in the record to support the finding that there is a medical relationship between the appellant’s work place injury and his undisclosed prior injury. Therefore, the Judge of Compensation Claims erred in concluding that the appellant’s petitions for benefits were barred by the Martin v. Carpenter, 132 So.2d 400 (Fla.1961), defense. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

954 So. 2d 60, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2007 WL 879003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-cone-distributing-inc-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack