Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc.

954 So. 2d 60, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2007 WL 879003
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 2007·No. No. 1D06-1690·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Robert Thompson, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims denying benefits for two work related accidents occurring on June 16, 2001, and August 7, 2001. The appellant correctly argues that no competent substantial evidence exists in the record to support the finding that there is a medical relationship between the appellant’s work place injury and his undisclosed prior injury. Therefore, the Judge of Compensation Claims erred in concluding that the appellant’s petitions for benefits were barred by the Martin v. Carpenter, 132 So.2d 400 (Fla.1961), defense. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc., 954 So. 2d 60, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2007 WL 879003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 60 (Thompson v. Cone Distributing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glabman v. De La Cruz
954 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)