Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
DEBRA ANN THOMPSON,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:21-cv-1333-RBD-LRH
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. ____________________________________
ORDER In this Social Security appeal, the pro se Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or properly move to proceed in forma pauperis despite three chances to do so. (Docs. 1, 2, 7, 10, 11.) So, on referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman entered a Report and Recommendation submitting that the Court should dismiss Plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 12 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object to the R&R and the time for doing so has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff's Appeal (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November 9, 2021.
Mai Miah a ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
Copies: Pro se Plaintiff Debra Ann Thompson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security (Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.