Thompson v. Commissioner
This text of 474 F. App'x 546 (Thompson v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
William C. Thompson appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision dismissing his appeal concerning tax years 1993-2004 and 2006 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de novo. Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly determined that it lacked jurisdiction because no notice of determination was issued for the tax years in question. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6320(c), 6330(d)(1) (conferring jurisdiction to the Tax Court for review of a levy or lien notice only after the IRS issues a determination based upon a collection due process hearing concerning the taxable period to which the unpaid tax relates); Gorospe, 451 F.3d at 968 (Tax Court’s subject matter jurisdiction is statutorily limited by Title 26 of the United States Code).
Thompson’s contentions concerning 26 U.S.C. § 7122 are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-commissioner-ca9-2012.