Thompson v. Columbia County

652 P.2d 380, 59 Or. App. 761, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3823
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 20, 1982
DocketNo. 26626, CA A22212
StatusPublished

This text of 652 P.2d 380 (Thompson v. Columbia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Columbia County, 652 P.2d 380, 59 Or. App. 761, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3823 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiffs in this case had standing to contest a sale of surplus property by Columbia County — and we find plaintiffs standing to be doubtful — the trial judge erred in cancelling the deed given by the county in this case. The sole issue was whether the county acted unreasonably. See ORS 275.200; Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308, 365 P2d 89 (1961). The undisputed evidence in this case concerning the previous offers to purchase this property establishes that the county did not act unreasonably.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. CRADDOCK
365 P.2d 89 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 P.2d 380, 59 Or. App. 761, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-columbia-county-orctapp-1982.