Thompson v. Columbia County

652 P.2d 380, 59 Or. App. 761, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3823
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 20, 1982·No. No. 26626, CA A22212·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiffs in this case had standing to contest a sale of surplus property by Columbia County — and we find plaintiffs standing to be doubtful — the trial judge erred in cancelling the deed given by the county in this case. The sole issue was whether the county acted unreasonably. See ORS 275.200; Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308, 365 P2d 89 (1961). The undisputed evidence in this case concerning the previous offers to purchase this property establishes that the county did not act unreasonably.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Columbia County, 652 P.2d 380, 59 Or. App. 761, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3823 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

652 P.2d 380 (Thompson v. Columbia County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. CRADDOCK
365 P.2d 89 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)