Thompson v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

Thompson v. Clarke

699 F. App'x 267

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2017·No. No. 17-6504·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no re-' versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Clarke, No. 2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no re-' versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Clarke, No. 2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Thompson v. Clarke, 699 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 267 (Thompson v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related