Thompson v. City of Reidsville

203 N.C. 502
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 16, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 203 N.C. 502 (Thompson v. City of Reidsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. City of Reidsville, 203 N.C. 502 (N.C. 1932).

Opinions

Connor, I.

The validity of the ordinance adopted by the defendant, city of Reidsville, on 14 August, 1930, and in force at the time of the trial, is not involved in this action which was begun on 17 June, 1930. The acts of the defendant, of which the plaintiffs complain, were all before the adoption of the ordinance. For this reason the question as to whether or not the ordinance is valid is not presented in this action.

There was no evidence tending to show that the orders of the city manager of the defendant, under which the “No Parking” signs were placed and maintained on Morehead Street, were arbitrary, unreasonable or unjustly discriminatory. These orders were made in the exercise of the police powers of the defendant, and plaintiffs are not entitled to recover of the defendant for any loss suffered by them which was incident to the exercise of this power. There was no error in the judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.C. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-city-of-reidsville-nc-1932.