Thompson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thompson v. City of New York

296 A.D.2d 571, 745 N.Y.S.2d 720, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7726

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 29, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 296 A.D.2d 571 (Thompson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. City of New York, 296 A.D.2d 571, 745 N.Y.S.2d 720, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the [572]*572Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated August 10, 2001, which denied her motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim and granted the cross motion of the defendant to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim and denied the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the [572]*572Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated August 10, 2001, which denied her motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim and granted the cross motion of the defendant to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim and denied the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 A.D.2d 571, 745 N.Y.S.2d 720, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2002.