Thompson v. City of New York

24 A.D.2d 427, 260 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3929
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 427 (Thompson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. City of New York, 24 A.D.2d 427, 260 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

— Order entered on January 28, 1965 granting plaintiff’s application to the extent of holding that the plaintiff’s time to file a notice of claim commenced running as of November 10, 1964 and that the notice of claim served on November 13, 1964 was timely served and filed, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion denied in its entirety. Subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law permits judicial intervention to extend the time within which to file a notice of claim only in specified circumstances. The failure of the attorney to discover that a condemnation order had vested title in the City of New York does not come within one of the circumstances enumerated in the statute. Therefore, there is no power in the court to grant the relief sought and the motion must be denied. This is unfortunate because the attorney followed the usual procedure of searching for the last owner.” In the circumstances, such search could not reveal the fact that the city had acquired the title by condemnation. However, it must be noted that sufficient information of public record was available to enable the attorney to discover that a change in title had been effected. The damage map had been filed in the Register’s office, a lis pendens had been filed, and the order of condemnation had been entered — all prior to the date when the plaintiff sustained his injury. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Tálente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norr v. Spiegler
72 A.D.2d 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 427, 260 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1965.