Thompson v. City of Cincinnati

31 Ohio Law Rep. 103
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 23, 1965
Docket38919
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ohio Law Rep. 103 (Thompson v. City of Cincinnati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. City of Cincinnati, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 103 (Ohio 1965).

Opinion

Herbert, J.

1. A municipal corporation may levy a tax on the wages resulting from work and labor performed within its boundaries by a nonresident of that municipal corporation. (Angell v. City of Toledo, 153 OhioSt. 179, 41 O.O. 217, approved and followed.)

2. Municipal corporation “A” may levy a tax on the wages resulting from work and labor performed in municipal corporation “B” by a resident of municipal corporation “A.”

3. No single municipal corporation may levy a tax on income at a greater rate than one per cent without first obtaining prior voter approval. No municipal corporation is deprived of its power to levy a tax on income by reason of any action taken by another municipal corporation. Section 718.01, Revised Code, construed.

4. A resident of one municipal corporation who receives wages as a result of work and labor performed within another municipal corporation may be lawfully taxed on such wages by both municipal corporations. Sections 3 and 7, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Van Nostran and Brown, JJ., concur. Van Nostran, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Schneider, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Angell v. City of Toledo
91 N.E.2d 250 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ohio Law Rep. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-city-of-cincinnati-ohio-1965.