Thompson v. Chapman
57 Ga. 16
Opinion
All the points discussed by counsel are disposed of in the head-notes. The rulings of the court would seem to need nothing by way of explication or comment. The case in 19 Georgia Reports, 534, besides being rather extreme on the measure and exactitude of proof, is distinguishable from this in the fact that the terms of a specific agreement are here proved. The tenant was to hold till a given time and then go out. The new landlord was accepted expressly. After that if he was not the lord, there was no lord at all.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Chapman, 57 Ga. 16 (Ga. 1876).
57 Ga. 16 (Thompson v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Gilly
66 S.E. 263 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)