Thompson v. Booth

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 29, 2022·No. 7:16-cv-03477·Unknown

Opinion

From: troy booth To: Halpern NYSD Chambers Subject: Fwd: Case#7:16cv 3477 Date: Sunday, March 20, 2022 11:51:43 AM

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message:

From: troy booth Date: March 20, 2022 at 10:45:22 AM CDT To: AD2-ClerksOffice@nycourts.gov Subject: Case#7:16cv 3477

Good day I am a retired New York State correction sergeant I am being held accountable for $50,000. I feel like something unfair is going on with this case. April 24, 2018 the plaintiff had an error filing. January 10, 2020 my union went against a contract agreement and stop representing me. February 13 2020 I did not receive the documents they claim, April 3, 2020 I was representing myself with no knowledge ,May 11th 2020 I was living different address ,March 10, 2021They file papers to the wrong address ,August 4, 2021 the plaintiff remedies were exhausted according to the court papers ,10 /25/21 and 2/1022 The court received letters from me that was my way of answering this complaint to my knowledge forgive me for the long email I have submitted photos for court documents.

Court construes Defendant Booth's March 20, 2022 e-mail as a motion to vacate the default judgment entered against □□□ compensatory damages in the amount of $50,000. Construing Defendant Booth's motion liberally, in light of his pro se tus, the Court finds that his motion is unsupported by fact and law. Indeed, Plaintiff's counsel served Defendant Booth with of all filings and orders relevant to the default proceedings against him. (Docs. 202-03, 213, 215-5 at 17, 218, 222). Booth does not claim, and provides no evidence, that he did not receive notice of the inquest hearing held on Marc 2022--he simply chose not to participate. Defendant Booth offers no reason, other than his pro se status, for his failure to in his defense and comply with this Court's orders. But this reason is insufficient to warrant vacatur, as a □□□□□□□□□□ se status does not prevent him or excuse him from participating in his defense. Therefore, to the extent Defendant Booth to vacate the default judgment entered against him, that motion is denied. See, e.g., First Palm Beach Int'l Bank v. de Descuento, S.A., No. 85-CV-03656, 1989 WL 38122, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 1989) (denying motion to vacate defau gment where defendant "received proper notice in this matter and failed to participate in its disposition"). will be docketed separately. counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on Defendant Booth and file proof of service on the docket. ORDERED.

M. Halpern ited States District Judge White Plains, New York March 90 9N99

Pore T fal [Head i aa |g a7 a a | Ses 25 it u

i iy vil! Nhe Pasa | Hie rei epuag |b ldeepes |gituesl ives [ape i. § a GZebislaill |Pagees i Eerhee sei PREC i ia Fipuas ese legs

pe 3,8 AS%3 ae Bll a3: aa, pt life ay ie sil Dig Hales ba\e: fala qo EW We aaa ale eid i ava | cit 5an3 i a2 te 4 255 gute ay : i 2 \eeeas | suis Eas eres ill ait aL aaa ela HL ae piles ul lie ehh leg apes ae ay anal oa He alte An: ai ‘SHE beseiag eHhiales ee

= ie =u 3 = of : — ae ile le 1a \G8: a\s wags aoa |g ga : Ni bye ak ue \$482 i aS e | 2 ils dee bE i Ele u 3 lil S3\33 | 1 } sae aun □□ lit ae |g fp 4 il eSga2g. 23 Eales a e|e2e2 5 (eee | i af nH | | ey 28 iy □□ au AG ey ogy ial as bese \e23 3 ie i Ss ;

Tres uaens

{ge |g=325 if : Baaiey pees □□ |sg4e |z° i > |ovodagecs SBg@=6 oe Se |ee ee i} Bae Sel aueesea ses |=5 5 | | y= | = oo pate aio S “4 = S |§¢928s285)2 gecesespee lee |Heze By. □ 1). So Sae gow = a on Fe = c i i Ab: 233425|5 ceeeesesee |< |'eee F [28 |zzas¢ cileeegece cessed 2 |a5as

i [BS lage Ae eee sl oeahes. 2 | |24 |EEGs 55 Se eos

|Z /QbeSssias| ees Scleusey a: i _ Sess ye! 53

[o28/Ee8 gu fe) S oo = □

> : □ eee “e gael = Be f 8 aie Reel é g2 □□ |e3.%,, affeles |3 og Re | eecided |EReeSa3eeur 2% in = | = 25 □ oe 1 4 :

= Gat Sexee26S|2 ecesae: 28% a ee ao al a se soo 6% =i = 5 LEE messes lua) Gegbeshs □ | as Fa|-CECSSeESSkG ae laa ‘ca\aaec esas #Re-|8e |e aE RE |BEZReSiis/Ee selecegaues|ae aE lop [Eso2 #5|Mo □□ eo sack S| bis [3a |32232 2348/2958 ou ey bes □ □□ = (pe [Seeeeeesslsettes Bebbleas|ag □□ eo RE. = 85 sa(eeo Sai suger □ BF fea |Be |2SaeZe ee clas GSESS SR Seo) es 1&4 (SeeBe sizsezs Zoke □□ g=|es i SS" |Sg2e e202) e502 ZSSub eee a0] ee | 2 (Ss [eee esageias se Ele e |SES/ESE pees eal é ono Shs 81s

bi | dzNER TS) Lie eee Saxo | i ligd, Eble? aad a, o. ay |e Bl, ear cee E< 34 ee 2a E 2928952 |e g2225 2d eRe Se |Hige a oe 5 [eZ e252 g255 ees ae as □□ preezise|s oeeceeee: ga □□□ a | oe s |$8cse S02] 4 SeEL |Saee 2 geese E85) Byes eezeee gz Be □ i Pe |AgsEER 24/2522 552356 g\a2 |Eg25 = iegeees pana at |2¢8ze g \23 BEES Sir pial Bes □ □□ |e ae Ga ed ese egees = □□ □ Ly \gees?s #3 daaas 36 □ □□□□□ [ela ue eng a tll is G2 \2e388 qe|\z ba 28 bE ge qHelicts ge 28 43 eoea ce Ebdaas GHB 8a Sy |oeafeus a\stGkegeeense 3 Eg3| =i lia ui Reasze Z2sze a □ £ peeeegess vuHE us 1 = |PeRete Les GN ag gales □ a Baeul: a acti Ea BSzle fa/51,|S288segee/a sEPLiEEaS {Eas eS|2 by Aone Ge es niu Se a She ga|Sidlgoe2 tees = ae ——

A ts | = ly i a 2 a | sa □ “ME Se OE ag |Seee282e% a = 3 4 os fae 25S bn 3B] |S B nO? & 253% 2 B 23.2 ace 9 Su 2 = E 2 22 □ — ies ac ad ; |B gaa al 5 anges 3 286 ao 233) Te | leo Bee |e <3|\3 me Bgaogeees □□ ateee 3 eaalnaes Be |s8a SAne248 8: = Leas EwSs fe == 2o(s35 ge B2o' | |e ISE&s |peee PEeESS| □□ ois sa EBgsse |5 |g \seos =o ZEeve ag aoe Soa: or es a el we jeone e325 BeeES a5 “or S2i a EC □□□ \2 ec |S8e2 =e nee 5 Bas = eae! e | \Z2 |2338 Sees |"asee a £26 |3ae aac a \% leaden & Sey Pokus 2 ee Ae, 2 |2 at |S835 Hw etelee <3 ae \=S 3 E72. E |ee JEzE= |e e\2as 96 be 2 : yee □□ pall bee lacuulaes: i eeleiee (Gaes [8 E/E EAS Lelia Accel eo. lag 3/23 |gsis | ae aes3: ea|Se S\eg8. Bes ie. eel|glze age2 |e Sama 2 2e5|z 3 falecelig eles |e lL ia 33 4\2255 283 ES ES 3/53 |E25e Beis 25 25 ao|) £lo: BEEgS 85/48) 8)58 Z28d 16 Eal> “eZee 6 ga|= causes □□□ /812/8 5 gize labs Bosse ee a\S7e ka 8 Sa/E6 elgs Beeb Qreés geees aS, \E<§? BE PSSE □□ □ 22 |Zice |Z if s525||s alge 233383 sles 7 BE Teme zo g 2 Ay 2 ge eae |23/8|33 go gOS bess 2E|Soge $She oh: LC a opt hee “a Boas i £3 5 2 e558 | zeus Siete a baie e355 e|25|8 elbegis ZoSs\542 s\#sSi|mees SECHCRE ge 2 Ela □□ ue abe f e535 Bg|he. re 5 = = □ Te | a+ ‘a □ ‘a led /2eS leu As|ESaali LAY ae able | fe Sent from my iPhone

opening attachments or clicking on links.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Booth, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Thompson v. Booth (Thompson v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.