Thompson v. Board of Commissioners of the State Bar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Thompson v. Board of Commissioners of the State Bar

112 So. 919, 216 Ala. 694

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 24, 1927·No. 6 Div. 815·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The charge or information against the appellant, Thompson, substantially conforms to the statute, and was not therefore subject to the attack made upon same. After careful examination of the evidence ■ in this cause, the court is of the opinion, and so holds, that it supports the finding and conclusion of the board of commissioners, and the order of said board suspending the said Thompson from practicing law for two years is hereby affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The charge or information against the appellant, Thompson, substantially conforms to the statute, and was not therefore subject to the attack made upon same. After careful examination of the evidence ■ in this cause, the court is of the opinion, and so holds, that it supports the finding and conclusion of the board of commissioners, and the order of said board suspending the said Thompson from practicing law for two years is hereby affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Thompson v. Board of Commissioners of the State Bar, 112 So. 919, 216 Ala. 694 (Ala. 1927).

Pincite

112 So. 919 (Thompson v. Board of Commissioners of the State Bar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related