Thompson v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll, L. L.P. (In re Krueger)

Ohio Supreme Court

Thompson v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll, L. L.P. (In re Krueger)

119 N.E.3d 427, 2017 Ohio 9429, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1201

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 6, 2017

DocketNo. 17–AP–064

StatusPublished

This text of 119 N.E.3d 427 (Thompson v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll, L. L.P. (In re Krueger)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll, L. L.P. (In re Krueger), 119 N.E.3d 427, 2017 Ohio 9429, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

O'Connor, C.J.

*1201{¶ 1} Robert Thompson has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court, purportedly under R.C. 2701.03. According to Mr. Thompson's affidavit, he filed the underlying legal-malpractice action in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. However, he avers that "[a] change of venue to Delaware County, Ohio, is pending," and he seeks to disqualify the two judges of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, General Division-Judge David Gormley and Judge Everett Krueger-from presiding over this matter.

{¶ 2} Mr. Thompson's affidavit is premature. R.C. 2701.03(A) authorizes a litigant to file an affidavit of disqualification "in a proceeding pending before the court." According to Mr. Thompson's affidavit, the underlying case remains pending in Franklin County. Indeed, he has failed to identify a Delaware County case number; nor has he identified which Delaware County judge was assigned to his case. Under these circumstances, it would be inappropriate to rule on the issue of Judge Gormley's or Judge Krueger's potential disqualification. See In re Disqualification of Hayes , 135 Ohio St.3d 1221, 2012-Ohio-6306, 985 N.E.2d 501, ¶ 4-7 ; In re Disqualification of Grossmann , 74 Ohio St.3d 1254, 1255-1256, 657 N.E.2d 1356 (1994).

{¶ 3} The affidavit of disqualification is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor, C.J.

*1201{¶ 1} Robert Thompson has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court, purportedly under R.C. 2701.03. According to Mr. Thompson's affidavit, he filed the underlying legal-malpractice action in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. However, he avers that "[a] change of venue to Delaware County, Ohio, is pending," and he seeks to disqualify the two judges of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, General Division-Judge David Gormley and Judge Everett Krueger-from presiding over this matter.

{¶ 2} Mr. Thompson's affidavit is premature. R.C. 2701.03(A) authorizes a litigant to file an affidavit of disqualification "in a proceeding pending before the court." According to Mr. Thompson's affidavit, the underlying case remains pending in Franklin County. Indeed, he has failed to identify a Delaware County case number; nor has he identified which Delaware County judge was assigned to his case. Under these circumstances, it would be inappropriate to rule on the issue of Judge Gormley's or Judge Krueger's potential disqualification. See In re Disqualification of Hayes , 135 Ohio St.3d 1221, 2012-Ohio-6306, 985 N.E.2d 501, ¶ 4-7 ; In re Disqualification of Grossmann , 74 Ohio St.3d 1254, 1255-1256, 657 N.E.2d 1356 (1994).

{¶ 3} The affidavit of disqualification is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 N.E.3d 427, 2017 Ohio 9429, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-bingham-greenebaum-doll-l-lp-in-re-krueger-ohio-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack