Thompson v. BFP 300 Madison II, LLC

95 A.D.3d 543, 943 N.Y.S.2d 515
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 95 A.D.3d 543 (Thompson v. BFP 300 Madison II, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. BFP 300 Madison II, LLC, 95 A.D.3d 543, 943 N.Y.S.2d 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered May 2, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6) and for common-law negligence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff injured his hand while moving a large fan coil box, which he did without the assistance of others. The court properly dismissed the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims as against all defendants, since plaintiff’s injury was caused not by a dangerous condition on the work site, but by the method or manner in which he chose to accomplish the task of moving the object (see Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d 290, 295 [1992]; LaRosa v Internap Network Servs. Corp., 83 AD3d 905, 908-909 [2011]). Moreover, the record demonstrates that defendants exercised no supervision or control over plaintiffs work (see Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876 [1993]).

The Labor Law § 241 (6) claim was also properly dismissed. The Industrial Code provisions on which plaintiffs relied involved tripping hazards (12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [e]), sharp objects (id.), and material piles (12 NYCRR 23-2.1 [a]), and were inap[544]*544plicable to this case (see Waitkus v Metropolitan Hous. Partners, 50 AD3d 260 [2008]; Castillo v Starrett City, 4 AD3d 320, 321 [2004]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MILES, SEYMOUR v. BUFFALO STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION, I
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Miles v. Buffalo State Alumni Ass'n
121 A.D.3d 1573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Johnson v. 923 Fifth Avenue Condominium
102 A.D.3d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 543, 943 N.Y.S.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-bfp-300-madison-ii-llc-nyappdiv-2012.