Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge

101 N.W. 61, 138 Mich. 81, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 792
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1904
DocketCalendar No. 20,743
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 N.W. 61 (Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge, 101 N.W. 61, 138 Mich. 81, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 792 (Mich. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ will be denied. The case is distinguishable from Voigt Brewery Co. v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 103 Mich. 190. In that case the effect of. the action of the circuit judge was to adjudge that a settlement of a cause of action was fraudulent. It was held that such question could not be thus tried. Here there is no such question. The plaintiff is merely required to proceed with her cause or pay the costs. If the discontinuance in such a case was obtained fraudulently, we think the court might set the same aside on motion and proper showing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apple v. Ganson
76 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1947)
Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.
193 A. 204 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1937)
Johnson v. Harvester Mutual Fire Insurance
243 N.W. 242 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 N.W. 61, 138 Mich. 81, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-bay-circuit-judge-mich-1904.