Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge

101 N.W. 61, 138 Mich. 81, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 792
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 1904·No. Calendar No. 20,743·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ will be denied. The case is distinguishable from Voigt Brewery Co. v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 103 Mich. 190. In that case the effect of. the action of the circuit judge was to adjudge that a settlement of a cause of action was fraudulent. It was held that such question could not be thus tried. Here there is no such question. The plaintiff is merely required to proceed with her cause or pay the costs. If the discontinuance in such a case was obtained fraudulently, we think the court might set the same aside on motion and proper showing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge, 101 N.W. 61, 138 Mich. 81, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 792 (Mich. 1904).

101 N.W. 61 (Thompson v. Bay Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apple v. Ganson
76 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1947)
Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.
193 A. 204 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1937)
Johnson v. Harvester Mutual Fire Insurance
243 N.W. 242 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)