Thompson v. Barab

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Thompson v. Barab

19 A.2d 780, 126 N.J.L. 427, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 333

DecidedApril 25, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.2d 780 (Thompson v. Barab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Barab, 19 A.2d 780, 126 N.J.L. 427, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 333 (N.J. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of the Atlantic County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiff sued to recover for injuries received by reason of a fall over a hose stretched across a sidewalk while oil was being delivered from a truck of defendant to premises adjacent to the sidewalk.

In the Supreme Court appellant urged fourteen grounds of appeal. On this appeal, defendant-appellant urges as ground of reversal only grounds of appeal numbers three, four, six, seven and eight, waiving all of the others. Numbers three and four relate to plaintiff’s requests to charge, which were charged, and numbers six, seven and eight are defendant’s requests to charge, which were not charged in the language requested.

On these questions submitted on this appeal, we affirm for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Portee, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI