Thompson v. Baker

74 Me. 48, 1882 Me. LEXIS 98

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided June 30, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

AppletoN, C. J.

The lien acquired by the attachment was lost by the neglect to retain possession of the property attached.

The property attached was easily removeable. The case is not within E. S.,.c. 81, § 24.

If the attachment was valid, it was but the attachment of the interest of only one co-tenant. The sale of the whole property was wrongful.

Judgment for plaintiff.

WaltoN, Barrows, DaNforth, Yirgest and SymoNds, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AppletoN, C. J.

The lien acquired by the attachment was lost by the neglect to retain possession of the property attached.

The property attached was easily removeable. The case is not within E. S.,.c. 81, § 24.

If the attachment was valid, it was but the attachment of the interest of only one co-tenant. The sale of the whole property was wrongful.

Judgment for plaintiff.

WaltoN, Barrows, DaNforth, Yirgest and SymoNds, JJ., concurred.

Thompson v. Baker, 74 Me. 48, 1882 Me. LEXIS 98 (Me. 1882).

Pincite

74 Me. 48 (Thompson v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.