Thompson v. Baca

D. Nevada

Thompson v. Baca

DecidedApril 29, 2021

Docket3:17-cv-00330

StatusUnknown

This text of Thompson v. Baca (Thompson v. Baca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Baca, (D. Nev. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 MARCEL D. THOMPSON, Case No. 3:17-cv-00330-MMD-WGC

6 Petitioner, ORDER v. 7 ISIDRO BACA, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner Marcel D. Thompson filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis 11 (ECF No. 1) submitted with his petition for writ of habeas corpus. On September 30, 2019, 12 the Court stayed this matter pending completion of Ninth Circuit proceedings in Case No. 13 18-71374 and this matter was administratively closed until further order of the Court. (ECF 14 No. 20.) Respondents have now filed a suggestion of death on the record indicating that 15 Thompson died on April 15, 2021. (ECF No. 24.) The Nevada Department of Corrections’ 16 (“NDOC”) online records1 confirm that Thompson is deceased. 17 The Court may entertain a state prisoner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus only 18 on the ground that he is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of 19 the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A petitioner’s death renders the habeas petition 20 moot. See Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing petition 21 for a writ of certiorari from appellate decision in criminal proceedings upon petitioner’s 22 death); Farmer v. McDaniel, 692 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012) (upon notice of petitioner’s 23 death, appeal dismissed as moot and case remanded to district court to dismiss habeas 24 petition as moot); Garceau v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005) (“Because 25 petitioner’s death renders this case moot, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should 26

27 1The Court takes judicial notice of Petitioner’s current status as reported in the NDOC’s online records. The inmate search tool may be accessed by the public online at: 28 https://ofdsearch.doc.nv.gov 1 be dismissed as moot.”); Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2003) (same). 2 Thompson’s death constitutes an end to his detention; thus, this action no longer 3 presents a live case or controversy. Accordingly, the petition challenging his allegedly 4 unconstitutional confinement is now moot. 5 It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of the Court is instructed to re-open this case. 6 It is further ordered that Petitioner Marcel D. Thompson’s petition for writ of habeas 7 corpus (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice as moot, on account of Thompson’s 8 death. 9 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. 10 DATED THIS 29th Day of April 2021.

13 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 MARCEL D. THOMPSON, Case No. 3:17-cv-00330-MMD-WGC

6 Petitioner, ORDER v. 7 ISIDRO BACA, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner Marcel D. Thompson filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis 11 (ECF No. 1) submitted with his petition for writ of habeas corpus. On September 30, 2019, 12 the Court stayed this matter pending completion of Ninth Circuit proceedings in Case No. 13 18-71374 and this matter was administratively closed until further order of the Court. (ECF 14 No. 20.) Respondents have now filed a suggestion of death on the record indicating that 15 Thompson died on April 15, 2021. (ECF No. 24.) The Nevada Department of Corrections’ 16 (“NDOC”) online records1 confirm that Thompson is deceased. 17 The Court may entertain a state prisoner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus only 18 on the ground that he is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of 19 the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A petitioner’s death renders the habeas petition 20 moot. See Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing petition 21 for a writ of certiorari from appellate decision in criminal proceedings upon petitioner’s 22 death); Farmer v. McDaniel, 692 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012) (upon notice of petitioner’s 23 death, appeal dismissed as moot and case remanded to district court to dismiss habeas 24 petition as moot); Garceau v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005) (“Because 25 petitioner’s death renders this case moot, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should 26

27 1The Court takes judicial notice of Petitioner’s current status as reported in the NDOC’s online records. The inmate search tool may be accessed by the public online at: 28 https://ofdsearch.doc.nv.gov 1 be dismissed as moot.”); Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2003) (same). 2 Thompson’s death constitutes an end to his detention; thus, this action no longer 3 presents a live case or controversy. Accordingly, the petition challenging his allegedly 4 unconstitutional confinement is now moot. 5 It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of the Court is instructed to re-open this case. 6 It is further ordered that Petitioner Marcel D. Thompson’s petition for writ of habeas 7 corpus (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice as moot, on account of Thompson’s 8 death. 9 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. 10 DATED THIS 29th Day of April 2021.

13 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Thompson v. Baca, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-baca-nvd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack