Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.

Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.

102 S.E. 374, 25 Ga. App. 27, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 572
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1920·No. 11121·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under all the facts of the case the court did not err in excluding the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff.

2. The evidence adduced by the plaintiff failed to prove as against any [28] of the defendants any act of negligence as alleged in the petition as amended. The court therefore properly awarded a nonsuit.

Decided March 3, 1920. Action fox damages; from city court of Atlanta—■ Judge Reid. October 21, 1919. Mark Bolding, J. Caleb Clarke, for plaintiff. Candler, Thomson & Hirsch, Roy Lewis, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc., 102 S.E. 374, 25 Ga. App. 27, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 374 (Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barron v. Evans
153 S.E.2d 577 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)