Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.

Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.

102 S.E. 374, 25 Ga. App. 27, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 572
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1920
Docket11121
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 374 (Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc., 102 S.E. 374, 25 Ga. App. 27, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under all the facts of the case the court did not err in excluding the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff.

2. The evidence adduced by the plaintiff failed to prove as against any [28]*28of the defendants any act of negligence as alleged in the petition as amended. The court therefore properly awarded a nonsuit.

Decided March 3, 1920. Action fox damages; from city court of Atlanta—■ Judge Reid. October 21, 1919. Mark Bolding, J. Caleb Clarke, for plaintiff. Candler, Thomson & Hirsch, Roy Lewis, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barron v. Evans
153 S.E.2d 577 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 374, 25 Ga. App. 27, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-asa-g-candler-inc-gactapp-1920.