Thompson v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
This text of 127 F. App'x 152 (Thompson v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court in its order of November 3, 2004. Thompson’s claim is for negligent use or custody of the stool, and not for strict liability.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. App'x 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-amf-bowling-centers-inc-ca5-2005.