Thompson v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
127 F. App'x 152
Opinion
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court in its order of November 3, 2004. Thompson’s claim is for negligent use or custody of the stool, and not for strict liability.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., 127 F. App'x 152 (5th Cir. 2005).
127 F. App'x 152 (Thompson v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.