Thompson v. Alexander

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedDecember 5, 2007
DocketI.C. NOS. 559307 PH-1669.
StatusPublished

This text of Thompson v. Alexander (Thompson v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Alexander, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Opinion

* * * * * * * * * * *
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Hall and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Hall with minor modifications.

* * * * * * * * * * *
The following were received into evidence as:
*Page 2

EXHIBITS
1. Stipulated Exhibit No. 1 — Thompson medical records, medical bills, and rating.

2. Plaintiff Putnam's Exhibit No. 1 — Invoices of hours submitted by Randy Alexander.

3. Defendant Randy Alexander Exhibit No. 1 — Statement Putnam signed in hospital.

* * * * * * * * * * *
ISSUES PRESENTED
1. Whether an employment relationship existed between plaintiff and Randy Alexander or between plaintiff and Majestic Mountain Construction, Inc.

2. Whether Majestic Mountain Construction, Inc. is a statutory employer under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19.

3. Whether plaintiff met his burden of proof to establish a compensable claim.

4. Whether any penalties should be assessed for failing to provide workers' compensation insurance as required by the Act.

* * * * * * * * * * *
Based upon all the competent evidence of record, the undersigned makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All parties have been correctly designated, and there is no question as to misjoinder or nonjoinder of parties.

2. Plaintiff was 37 years old at the time of the hearing before the deputy commissioner. Plaintiff's prior work history was in the construction industry doing carpentry work. *Page 3

3. Plaintiff began working as a carpenter for defendant Randy Alexander in or about March 2005, approximately three to four months prior to his June 16, 2005 injury. At the time of plaintiff's injury, plaintiff was employed by defendant Randy Alexander, a subcontractor for defendant Majestic Mountain Construction, Inc., which was owned by Marsha Patterson-Jones, constructing custom villas or town homes in Glenville, North Carolina. Ms. Patterson-Jones was the general contractor that pulled the permits for the job on which plaintiff was injured.

4. Ben Jones, Ms. Patterson-Jones' husband, was the site manager for the property on which defendant Majestic Mountain was developing and plaintiff was working. Mr. Jones hired the subcontractors, told them what to do, checked to make sure the work was being done properly, and reported back to his wife on what materials needed to be ordered. Mr. Jones is not a licensed contractor. Majestic Mountain Construction, Inc. provided the materials for the job.

5. Ben Jones indicated that all the subcontractors were required to have workers' compensation insurance and that Randy Alexander was going to provide him with proof of coverage. Mr. Alexander never provided proof of coverage. Mike Jones, a subcontractor that had his own crew and also did carpentry work on the same jobsite as Mr. Alexander, did have workers' compensation according to Ben Jones, as did some of the other subcontractors.

6. Mr. Alexander gave Mr. Jones invoices with the number of hours for his employees. Mr. Alexander made money on his crew by charging the general contractor more per hour for his crew than the hourly amount he actually paid his crew. Mr. Jones said that he did not recall seeing invoices with hours on them and that he dealt with subcontractors on contract prices based on a certain amount of money per measurements such as per square or linear feet.

7. William Patterson testified that he was the majority owner of the property where the accident subject of this case occurred. Mr. Patterson said that Majestic Mountain *Page 4 Construction, Inc., which was owned by his daughter, did not get paid on a regular basis, but got paid on the sale of the units. Mr. Patterson said that his daughter was part owner of the property although she was not on the deed; however, no documents were produced to support that assertion. Mr. Patterson needed a general contractor to pull permits on the construction job and was able to get Majestic Mountain Construction, Inc. to operate in that capacity with an agreement that the general contractor would not get paid until the units sold.

8. On June 16, 2005, plaintiff sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant Randy Alexander. Mr. Alexander did not have workers' compensation insurance and did not provide proof of insurance to the general contractor.

9. Randy Alexander, Michael Putman, Tim Tanner, and plaintiff were working on a second-story deck that collapsed and broke away from the town home, causing plaintiff to fall approximately 15 to 16 feet onto a lower deck, then fall to the ground approximately 10 feet below the lower deck, and then down an embankment.

10. Plaintiff was then transported to Harris Regional Hospital in Sylva, North Carolina by ambulance and then to Mission St. Joseph Hospital on the same date. Plaintiff was diagnosed with multiple left rib fractures, collapsed lung, skull fracture, and left wrist fractures. On June 20, 2005, plaintiff underwent a closed reduction and pinning of left distal radius fracture and was discharged on June 25, 2005. On July 14, 2005, plaintiff underwent a closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of radius styloid with multiple K wires.

11. Plaintiff participated in physical therapy until he was discharged on October 11, 2005 and continued to perform exercises at home. Due to the collapsed lung, plaintiff had on-going respiratory problems and pneumonia. *Page 5

12. Pursuant to orders from Dr. Kenneth W. Graf of Trauma Orthopedic Surgery, plaintiff was unable to work from June 16, 2005 through April 26, 2006 as a result of his compensable injury.

13. Plaintiff was released to return to work on April 26, 2006 with no restrictions. At that time, plaintiff began working full time with Engineered Refrigeration System servicing restaurants and businesses.

14. Since the time of his release, plaintiff has continued to have difficulty with strength, swelling, decreased range of motion, weakness of pinch and grip, and pain in the left wrist. Plaintiff continued to see Dr. James S. Thompson with Blue Ridge Bone and Joint in Asheville, North Carolina for care and treatment.

15. On December 14, 2006, based upon plaintiff's level of pain, decreased range of motion, and weakness of pinch and grip, Dr. Thompson assigned plaintiff a permanent partial impairment rating of 25% to the left upper limb for plaintiff's wrist fracture sustained on June 16, 2005.

16. Plaintiff incurred $33,872.86 in medical expenses with the following providers: Glenville/Cashiers EMS, WestCare EMS, Harris Regional Hospital, Mission/St. Josephs Hospital, Carolina Mountain Emergency, Asheville Radiology, Mountain Neurology Center, MMH Trauma Surgeons, Asheville Anesthesia, Carolina West Radiology, Blue Ridge Bone and Joint, Swain Medical Center, Swain Hospital, and Hospital Hill Pharmacy.

17. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was earning $16.00 per hour and working 40 hours per week.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-19
North Carolina § 97-19
§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-25.1
North Carolina § 97-25.1
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-31
North Carolina § 97-31(13)
§ 97-93
North Carolina § 97-93
§ 97-94
North Carolina § 97-94(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thompson v. Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-alexander-ncworkcompcom-2007.