Thompson v. Aldredge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Thompson v. Aldredge

200 S.E. 799, 187 Ga. 467

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1939

DocketNo. 12632

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 200 S.E. 799 (Thompson v. Aldredge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Aldredge, 200 S.E. 799, 187 Ga. 467 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

This record presents the question whether the crime of sodomy, as defined by our law, can be accomplished between two women. By Code, § 26-5901, sodomy is defined as “the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman.” Wharton, in his Criminal Law, volume 1, 11 ed., § 754, lays down the rule that “the crime of sodomy proper can not be accomplished between two women, though the crime of bestiality may be.” We have no reason to believe that our lawmakers in defining the crime of sodomy intended to give it any different meaning. Indeed the language of the Code above quoted seems to us to deliberately exclude the idea that this particular crime may be accomplished by two women, although it may be committed by two men, or a man and a woman. That the act here alleged to have been committed is just as loathsome when participated in by two women does not justify us in reading into the definition of the crime something which the lawmakers omitted.

The petitioner’s conviction was a nullity and she is entitled to be discharged. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

This record presents the question whether the crime of sodomy, as defined by our law, can be accomplished between two women. By Code, § 26-5901, sodomy is defined as “the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman.” Wharton, in his Criminal Law, volume 1, 11 ed., § 754, lays down the rule that “the crime of sodomy proper can not be accomplished between two women, though the crime of bestiality may be.” We have no reason to believe that our lawmakers in defining the crime of sodomy intended to give it any different meaning. Indeed the language of the Code above quoted seems to us to deliberately exclude the idea that this particular crime may be accomplished by two women, although it may be committed by two men, or a man and a woman. That the act here alleged to have been committed is just as loathsome when participated in by two women does not justify us in reading into the definition of the crime something which the lawmakers omitted.

The petitioner’s conviction was a nullity and she is entitled to be discharged. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.E. 799, 187 Ga. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-aldredge-ga-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack