Thompson Mahogany Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Thompson Mahogany Co. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 177

United States Customs Court·Decided July 12, 1948·No. No. 52452; protest 120502-K (Laredo)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial the plaintiff established that the imported lumber consisted of mahogany which had been sawed into boards arid then planed on one edge. It was also established that as imported, the lumber was not dedicated to any particular use, and was not flooring. Upon the record it was held that the lumber was entitled to free entry under paragraph 1803, as claimed. Thompson Mahogany Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 204, C. D. 894) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial the plaintiff established that the imported lumber consisted of mahogany which had been sawed into boards arid then planed on one edge. It was also established that as imported, the lumber was not dedicated to any particular use, and was not flooring. Upon the record it was held that the lumber was entitled to free entry under paragraph 1803, as claimed. Thompson Mahogany Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 204, C. D. 894) cited.

Thompson Mahogany Co. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 177 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

21 Cust. Ct. 177 (Thompson Mahogany Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related