Thompson, James

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 26, 2015
DocketWR-83,593-01
StatusPublished

This text of Thompson, James (Thompson, James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson, James, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,593-01

EX PARTE JAMES THOMPSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 13-CR-0498-B IN THE 117TH DISTRICT COURT FROM NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of

aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecency with a child, and was sentenced to

life imprisonment for each count, with the sentence in Count 3 to run consecutively with the life

sentences in Counts 1, 2 and 4. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Thompson

v. State, No. 13-13-00558-CR (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi, August 14, 2014)(not designated for

publication). 2

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of

his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify

Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for

discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 13-13-

00558-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 13-CR-0498-B from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within

30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: August 26, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thompson, James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-james-texcrimapp-2015.