Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Hamrick

209 S.E.2d 305, 23 N.C. App. 550, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2151
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 6, 1974·No. 7429SC654·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*551 VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s plea of res judicata in this case should have been sustained only if there was an identity of parties, subject matter and issues with the earlier case. The minor plaintiff in this case was neither a party nor one in privity with a party to the other action and, of course, he had no control over the other lawsuit. That his father was a party in the other action is irrelevant to this minor’s right to prosecute his separate cause of action. The judgment from which plaintiff appealed is contrary to law and must be reversed.

Reversed.

Judges Campbell and Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Hamrick, 209 S.E.2d 305, 23 N.C. App. 550, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2151 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

209 S.E.2d 305 (Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Hamrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. West
657 S.E.2d 694 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
York ex rel. York v. Northern Hospital District of Surry County
386 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)