Thompson, Ex Parte Earl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2011
DocketAP-76,614
StatusPublished

This text of Thompson, Ex Parte Earl (Thompson, Ex Parte Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson, Ex Parte Earl, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,614

EX PARTE EARL THOMPSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1091097 IN THE 263rd DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of stalking and

sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Thompson v. State, No. 14-08-00481-CR (Tex. Crim. App.–Houston [14th Dist.], delivered May 19,

2009).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review pro se. 2

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise him of his

right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-08-00481-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 1091097 from the 263rd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his

petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s

mandate issues.

Delivered: August 24, 2011 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thompson, Ex Parte Earl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-ex-parte-earl-texcrimapp-2011.