Thompson, Eric Laval

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 25, 2015
DocketWR-74,986-02
StatusPublished

This text of Thompson, Eric Laval (Thompson, Eric Laval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson, Eric Laval, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-74,986-02

EX PARTE ERIC LAVAL THOMPSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 68897-A IN THE 264th DISTRICT COURT FROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of criminal

solicitation of a minor and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Thompson v. State, No. 07-12-00454-CR (Tex. Crim. App—Amarillo,

delivered September 19, 2014) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. 2

Based on the record and an affidavit filed by counsel, the trial court has entered findings of

fact and conclusions of law that counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had

been affirmed. The trial court recommends relief be granted and we agree with that

recommendation. However, we disagree with the trial court’s finding of ineffective assistance of

counsel in this case and find that counsel’s failure to timely notify Applicant of the appellate court’s

decision was through no fault of her own. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-12-00454-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 68897 from the 264th District Court of Bell County.

Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date

on which this Court’s mandate issues.

The Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: November 25, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thompson, Eric Laval, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-eric-laval-texcrimapp-2015.