Thompson, Curtis Lee

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
DocketWR-50,417-03
StatusPublished

This text of Thompson, Curtis Lee (Thompson, Curtis Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson, Curtis Lee, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-50,417-03

EX PARTE CURTIS LEE THOMPSON, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 781408-C IN THE 179TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Thompson v. State, No. 08-99-00144-CR (Tex. App. - El Paso, October 5, 2000, no pet.)

In the instant application, Applicant raises several grounds for relief which are based on post-conviction testing of DNA under Chapter 64. Applicant also alleges that the State improperly used evidence of a prior conviction at Applicant's trial.

This Court has reviewed Applicant's claims pertaining to the post-conviction DNA proceedings, and has determined that they are either without merit, or that the writ of habeas corpus is not available for his claims of error in those proceedings. See Ex parte Baker, 185 S.W.3d 894 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Ex parte Suhre, 185 S.W.3d 898 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Therefore, those claims are denied. Applicant's remaining claim is barred from review, and is dismissed. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 § 4.



Filed: February 11, 2009

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Suhre
185 S.W.3d 898 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Baker
185 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thompson, Curtis Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-curtis-lee-texcrimapp-2009.