Thompson, Cleveland Wade
This text of Thompson, Cleveland Wade (Thompson, Cleveland Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CLEVELAND WADE THOMPSON, Relator
v.
SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent
O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he mailed for filing, on March 28, 2011, an application for a writ of habeas corpus addressed to the Clerk for the 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.
In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Smith County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); or stating that Relator has not filed an application for habeas corpus in Smith County. Should the response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney's office was served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order, and Respondent shall serve a copy of any such response on Relator.
Filed: June 8, 2011
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thompson, Cleveland Wade, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-cleveland-wade-texcrimapp-2011.