Thompson, Charles Edward

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 2, 2019
DocketWR-89,601-01
StatusPublished

This text of Thompson, Charles Edward (Thompson, Charles Edward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson, Charles Edward, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,601-01

EX PARTE CHARLES EDWARD THOMPSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1380303-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. KELLER , P.J. filed a dissenting opinion in which KEEL and SLAUGHTER , JJ., joined. YEARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because a newly disclosed laboratory report

shows that he possessed less than one gram of cocaine. He was charged with the third degree felony

of possession of cocaine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. Applicant was

admonished as to the penalty range for a third degree felony. However, after Applicant’s conviction 2

became final, the laboratory report was disclosed showing that the substance Applicant possessed

weighed less than one gram. Because this quantity of cocaine would have only supported a charge

and conviction for a state jail felony, the State agreed that Applicant’s plea was not knowingly and

voluntarily entered. The trial court determined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case

was not a voluntary and intelligent choice. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1969); Ex parte

Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129, 131 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 138030301010 in the 179th District Court of

Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County

to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 2, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. United States
397 U.S. 742 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thompson, Charles Edward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-charles-edward-texcrimapp-2019.